top of page

MassHealth Myths That Could Cost Your Family Everything

  • Writer: Kathy L. McNair, Esq.
    Kathy L. McNair, Esq.
  • 1 day ago
  • 5 min read

In nearly 28 years of practicing elder law, I have heard many confident statements from families that turned out to be wrong in ways that cost them dearly. Not because they were careless or uninformed, but because they did what most of us do.


Myth #1: "My neighbor did it, so it should work for me too."

This is where most misconceptions begin. Someone hears about a strategy that worked for a friend, neighbor, or relative and assumes the same approach will have the same result for them. The problem is that MassHealth eligibility is extraordinarily fact-specific. The type and value of assets involved, the marital situation, the health status of both spouses, the timing of any transfers, the specific program being applied for, and dozens of other variables all affect the outcome. Two families who appear to be in nearly identical situations can have very different results based on details that aren't obvious from the outside.


Beyond that, the rules themselves have changed. Strategies that were effective five or ten years ago may no longer work, or may now trigger penalties that didn't exist when your neighbor used them. MassHealth is actively tightening its practices, and what was overlooked in the past is being scrutinized carefully today.


Myth #2: "We put the house in my child's name, so it's protected."

Transferring a home to a child is one of the most common strategies families attempt on their own, and one that can be frought with problems. Simply putting a house in a child's name does not automatically protect it from MassHealth. Depending on when the transfer happened, it may fall within the five-year look-back period and trigger a penalty. Depending on how it was done, it may have created unintended income or gift tax consequences. Depending on the child's financial situation, the home may now be exposed to the child's creditors, divorce proceedings, or other liabilities.


There are legitimate planning tools that involve transferring or restructuring home ownership, but they require careful legal structuring to work as intended. A transfer done informally, without proper planning, can create more problems than it solves.


A related misconception we hear frequently: "Our house is in a trust, so it's protected." This one depends entirely on what kind of trust, and most people don't know the difference.


A revocable trust, the kind most commonly used in basic estate planning, does not protect your home from MassHealth under any circumstances. Because you retain control of a revocable trust and can change or dissolve it at any time, MassHealth treats those assets as if they are still fully yours. The trust is essentially invisible for Medicaid purposes.


An irrevocable trust, structured correctly and established outside the five-year look-back period, can be an effective planning tool for protecting a home. But the details matter enormously — what the trust says, who the trustee is, what rights you retained, and when it was created all affect whether it will actually do what you think it does.

If your home is in a trust and you believe it is protected, it is worth having an elder law attorney review the actual trust document before you rely on that assumption.


Myth #3: "We didn't plan five years ahead, so it's too late to do anything."

This is one of the most discouraging things a family can believe, and fortunately, it is not true.


Planning well in advance of a crisis gives you the most options and the best opportunity to protect assets for your spouse, your children, or others you care about. If you have time on your side, use it. The five-year look-back period means that assets transferred into certain protective structures today may be fully shielded from MassHealth five years from now. Early planning is almost always better planning.


But a crisis does not eliminate your options. It changes them. When someone is already facing a serious illness, a sudden decline, or an imminent need for care, there are still legal strategies available to protect a meaningful portion of assets, even without five years to work with. Certain spend-down strategies, annuity planning, and other tools are designed specifically for families in crisis mode who need to act quickly. These strategies require careful, experienced guidance.


The worst thing a family can do in this situation is assume nothing can be done. Inaction is always the most expensive choice. If you are facing an urgent situation and wondering whether it is too late, call us before you conclude that it is. You may have more options than you think.


Myth #4: "We're married, so MassHealth won't touch our assets."

Marriage does provide some protections under MassHealth. The community spouse resource allowance, for example, allows a healthy spouse living at home to retain a certain amount of assets when their partner applies for long-term care benefits. But these protections are limited, have specific dollar caps, and are being applied with increasing scrutiny.


What many couples do not realize is that MassHealth counts assets belonging to both spouses when evaluating eligibility, not just the assets of the person applying. And as we have seen in our practice, MassHealth is now looking much more closely at spousal assets during both initial applications and redeterminations than in the past. Being married is not a shield. It is a factor, one of many, in a complex analysis.


Myth #5: "We already took care of it."

This may be the most expensive myth of all, not because the planning was necessarily wrong, but because it was done once and never revisited.

MassHealth rules change. Asset values change. Family situations change. A plan that was perfectly structured five years ago may have gaps today that no one has noticed because no one has looked. The look-back rules for PACE are new. The scrutiny of spousal assets has intensified. The redetermination process has become significantly more rigorous.


If your family did MassHealth planning at some point in the past and has not had it reviewed recently, now is a good time to do that, before a crisis makes it urgent.


Every Situation Is Unique

The common thread running through all of these myths is the assumption that there is a simple, universal answer, a trick that works, a rule that is easy to follow, a neighbor's experience that can be replicated.


MassHealth planning does not work that way. It requires carefully examining the specific facts of a family's situation, understanding the current rules and how they are applied in practice, and making deliberate decisions with full knowledge of the consequences.


That is what we do at Senior Solutions. If you have questions about whether your family's planning is still on solid ground, or if you have never had a real MassHealth planning conversation and are wondering where you stand, we are here to help.


At Senior Solutions, we believe that Planning + People = Peace of Mind®. The first step is making sure the plan you think you have is actually the plan you need.


 

Senior Solutions, Attorneys at Law, is an Estate Planning and Elder Law firm serving the Greater Boston, Massachusetts area since 2001. We are ready to help you with Medicaid Planning, Estate Planning, Probate, Guardianship & Conservatorships, Special Needs Trusts, and Fiduciary Services. We are here to help. Please call our office at 617-489-5900 or schedule a brief consultation by clicking the button below:



 
 
 

Comments


Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Thanks for submitting!

Resources for Seniors Aging Alone
Boston Elder Law Firm Member National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys

30 Church Street, Suite 210          

Belmont, MA 02478                       

 

Tel:   617-489-5900

Fax:  617-489-5922 

Boston Attorneys Guardianship

© 2025 Senior Solutions Attorneys at Law LLC

bottom of page